Wild Birds Likely NOT a Bird Flu Vector

Submitted by Lynn on Wed, 12/28/2005 - 4:43pm.

Bad news for chickens and other domestic fowl:

Scientists have been unable to link the spread of the virus to migratory patterns, suggesting that the thousands of wild birds that have died, primarily waterfowl and shore birds, are not primary transmitters of bird flu.

If that holds true, it would suggest that shipments of domestic chickens, ducks and other poultry represent a far greater threat than does the movement of wild birds on the wing.

It also would underscore the need to pursue the virus in poultry farms and markets rather than in wild populations of birds if a possible pandemic is to be checked, U.S. and European experts said.

Bird scientists are now saying that despite this fall's fears that wild birds were spreading the H5N1 it appears that they play a minor role; the strain may have evolved specifically to exploit domestic poultry.

What this means for human transmissal of the virus is not clear. All we know right now is that it still does not transmit human-to-human.

Technorati Tags:
( categories: | )

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options