"Forget the Career, My Parents Need Me"

Lynn's picture
Submitted by Lynn on Thu, 11/24/2005 - 6:45pm.

On the other end of the caretaker continuum we women find ourselves living, consider the Daughter Track, as increasing numbers of women are leaving their careers behind to take care of aging parents:

Despite a growing number of men helping aging relatives, women account for 71 percent of those devoting 40 or more hours a week to the task, according to the National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP in a 2004 study. Among those with the greatest burden of care, regardless of sex, 88 percent either take leaves of absence, quit or retire.

"It is a safe assumption," based on an array of research, "that women are more likely to put their careers on hold or end them because of care-giving responsibilities," said Carol Levine, director of the Families and Health Care Project at the United Hospital Fund and an adviser to the National Alliance for Caregiving.

One study she cites, by Phyllis Moen, now a sociologist at the University of Minnesota, tracked 5,113 respondents as they made retirement decisions. Among those who retired sooner than planned, the most common reason among women was care giving and among men the offer of a buyout.

Middle-aged women may see leaving a high-powered career as an opportunity, not a sacrifice, many experts say, which distinguishes the Daughter Track from the Mommy Track. Arlie Hochschild, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who has written extensively about the postfeminist conflict between work and family, said women in their 50's who had "proved what they set out to prove" were often drawn to "new sources of satisfaction" but were reluctant to admit an ebbing of ambition. The needs of ailing parents, Ms. Hochschild said, can offer "cultural shelter" - an excuse "to pull away and look inward."

Sad that a) more men don't do this, and b) you need "cultural shelter" to get off the hamster wheel. I wonder why it's more acceptable to do this for elderly parents than it is to do it for children?

Technorati Tags:

( categories: )

Related items you may be interested in:
Susannah's picture

Hmmm...

Submitted by Susannah on Fri, 11/25/2005 - 9:44am.

My husband is a fine, affectionate man who loves his mother dearly--they are very close--and has already opened our home to her after her retirement...

But I can't see him in a long-term caregiver role. Why do we always seek to emasculate men and make them into women? Women are better suited for taking care of people. We are more empathetic and detail-oriented, and can anticipate needs far better than men can. We are also more likely to be multi-taskers. It seems natural to me that women should take on caregiving tasks more readily than men. I think if it became necessary he would try to do it out of love and respect for his mother...but wouldn't be able to do it *well.* KWIM?

As for ebbing of ambition, I don't view ambition as a positive thing. Having a passion for what you do: yes, that's great. Ambition is more akin to greed in my mind--lust for fame, importance, power, etc. Something neither men nor women should be hesistant to let go of, for the sake of their own spiritual health.

What the heck is "postfeminist," anyway?

Lynn's picture

Hmmm indeed!

Submitted by Lynn on Fri, 11/25/2005 - 11:57am.

Susannah wrote:
Why do we always seek to emasculate men and make them into women?

Why am I not surprised that's your take-away from the article? Smiling Did you click through and read it? It's actually very sympathetic and supportive.

Quote:
Women are better suited for taking care of people. We are more empathetic and detail-oriented, and can anticipate needs far better than men can. We are also more likely to be multi-taskers. It seems natural to me that women should take on caregiving tasks more readily than men. I think if it became necessary he would try to do it out of love and respect for his mother...but wouldn't be able to do it *well.* KWIM?

SOME men, however, are just as suited if not more so, and SOME women I wouldn't want near a caretaker role on a bet. For instance, in my hospital year some of my best nurses were men. None of them were emasculated, I can guarantee you.

Quote:
As for ebbing of ambition, I don't view ambition as a positive thing. Having a passion for what you do: yes, that's great. Ambition is more akin to greed in my mind--lust for fame, importance, power, etc. Something neither men nor women should be hesistant to let go of, for the sake of their own spiritual health.

Absolutely, and why I said it was sad these people needed permission of some kind to let it go.

Quote:
What the heck is "postfeminist," anyway?

Here's the rather tortured Wikipedia entry:

Post-feminism, or postfeminism, is an anti-essentialist philosophy* that opposes simplistic gender constructs of binary opposition (i.e., man and woman) in order to explore and identify conceptions of women outside of the mother/whore dichotomy. Post-feminist discourse examines the gradual elimination of another form of binary opposition as well: "feminists" versus "non-feminists". The defactionalization of these once clearly-delineated groups is a result of the success of feminist praxis** and activism in making gender inequality a concern of mainstream culture, in Western civilization and in other sociocultural contexts.

The term post-feminism does not imply that the era of feminist theory and activism have concluded (victoriously or otherwise). Rather, post-feminism acknowledges that the fractured identity of the individual has changed in the postmodern society, informed by social change predicated in part by feminist infuence; it is a tangential evolution of feminist thought.

The work of Angela Carter (especially her 1977 book The Passion of New Eve) and various "gender-bending" authors--such as Jeanette Winterson, Patricia Duncker, and Judith Butler--exhibit nuances of post-feminist thought.

Pornography is often cited as the first post-feminist industry, since it breaks the mother/whore dichotomy, and commoditizes gender and sexuality. Since many people decry pornography as inherently mysogynistic, some may confuse post-feminist politics with misogyny.

I don't know who writes these things. Translations (believe me, *I* had to look them up):

*Essentialism is a philosophy that believes that for an entity to be defined in a certain way that entity must contain ALL of a specific list of traits. An anti-essentialist philosophy in this particular case means: Just because someone doesn't have every trait that supposedly makes one a man doesn't mean that that person is NOT a man--or, conversely, a woman.

**Praxis: "The process of putting theoretical knowledge into practice."

And I disagree with the last paragraph. The commodification of sex did NOT start with feminism, post- or otherwise.

Stereotypes are stereotypes because there is truth behind them, and generally speaking women are more suited for the care of the elderly and the young than men. We can't condemn women who don't (and shouldn't) take on this role as "unfeminine" and simultaneously ridicule men who do as "emasculated." It has to be a role available to anyone who wants it and is suited to it, not enforced by gender, and celebrated by society rather than ignored and trivialized (which makes this post-feminist by the above definition).

It's, uh, KINDA THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS WEBSITE. Which I guess makes me post-feminist! Eye-wink

Becky's picture

possible reason

Submitted by Becky on Fri, 11/25/2005 - 11:45am.

"Sad that a) more men don't do this, and b) you need "cultural shelter" to get off the hamster wheel. I wonder why it's more acceptable to do this for elderly parents than it is to do it for children?"

I don't know about what we can do to change a and b, but I think the article itself implies why it is more acceptable to do this for elderly parents than for children. If your parents are elderly, you are likely to be old enough to be established in your career already, so you have already "proven" your abilities in this career. In fact, early retirement carries a bit of prestige. That makes it more obvious that it is truly a choice. If you stay home with children early in your career, however, you have not yet shown that you are able to succeed out in the world and it could be construed as a failure. Stupid? Fallacious? Yes, absolutely, but I think that is the subconscious thought process behind the attitudes.

Marlene's picture

I dunno....

Submitted by Marlene on Fri, 11/25/2005 - 1:48pm.

I dunno who is a better caretaker, man or woman. BUT I can say this...my mother has lived with us for 15 years and basically drives me nuts. She is almost 80, healthy and bitchy. Maybe I am glad I have to work? LOL!
M

Susannah's picture

LOL!

Submitted by Susannah on Sat, 11/26/2005 - 1:01am.

Yes, I have friends in similar circumstances. And I know it wasn't easy for my mother to care for her own mother, much as she loved her, mainly for purely practical reasons. The problem was, my mother *had* to work (no early retirement option), which left an unsafe environment for my grandmother. Eventually, grandma fell and wound up the hospital, and from there to a nursing home.

And, my mother was not physically able to lift her, etc. I don't know how caregivers manage when they have their own physical/aging problems to deal with.

Maybe it's just the guy I'm married to...but to be honest, I don't personally know many men who are suited for long-term caregiving, I mean for a family member, not as part of a job. (I have never been under the care of a male nurse myself. I can say I would prefer female nurses/midwives to male doctors, etc.)

My DH helped care for his quadraplegic housemate while we were in graduate school, in return for reduced rent. There were four housemates altogether (all guys, of course) and when on duty they helped feed him, get him into bed, etc. But most of his personal needs were met by in-home health: a female nurse. I do know that DH, though he really liked and cared about the guy, sometimes got impatient with being at his beck and call. Nevertheless, all the guys seemed to get along well, and they often threw parties, etc. In fact, that's how I really got to know my DH. Smiling I even spent one Thanksgiving at their house.

One advantage men definitely have over women is physical strength/ability to lift someone. There are tricks to doing it using your own body's leverage...I've done it before with my grandmother and I'm not a big person. But usually, we had DH around to lift her out of her wheelchair for us.

Whew! I can tell an academic wrote that entry. LOL!

Susannah's picture

This was interesting, if a bi

Submitted by Susannah on Sat, 11/26/2005 - 2:18am.

This was interesting, if a bit presumptuous...

"Post-feminist discourse examines the gradual elimination of another form of binary opposition as well: 'feminists' versus 'non-feminists'. The defactionalization of these once clearly-delineated groups is a result of the success of feminist praxis** and activism in making gender inequality a concern of mainstream culture, in Western civilization and in other sociocultural contexts."

Not me, though. You'd have to define feminism pretty darn broadly--to the point of meaninglessness--to include me in it. Smiling I'll always be in the non-feminist camp.

pregnancy

Becky's picture

I think it just means that ge

Submitted by Becky on Sat, 11/26/2005 - 9:04am.

I think it just means that gender relations/ inequality is a concern of mainstream culture, literally, not that everyone feels the same way about it. So if you are not a feminist and believe that gender inequality is a good thing, the fact that you think about it consciously at all is a result of the "success of feminist praxis." It is no longer binary because your reaction to feminist discourse is not, "What? Huh? That's ridiculous! I never heard of such a thing," but rather to make a reasoned argument against it as a debateable topic.

Susannah's picture

Found another article

Submitted by Susannah on Sun, 11/27/2005 - 8:06am.

This one not sympathetic at all to the choice of opting out. I did recognize the tone of the articles you've referenced, Lynn, but only objected to a couple of fine points. The article I read yesterday, though...whew! I blogged about it here, and also about why I'm not a feminist.

http://www.homeschoolblogger.com/SusannahCox/

Lynn's picture

a perversion of feminism

Submitted by Lynn on Sun, 11/27/2005 - 11:54am.

I started to write a long comment but I'm promoting it to blog entry. Stay tuned. Smiling

Lynn Siprelle, Editor

Becky's picture

didn't look at your blog, Susannah

Submitted by Becky on Sun, 11/27/2005 - 8:59am.

But I did read an anti-opting-out article in the LA Times recently that made my hair curl. Or it would have if my hair weren't already curly. Anyway, it was offensive. And it didn't even consider the fact that some men opt out too.

Really the most traditional TNH couple, as far as regulars go, are Jenny and Jeff because they work and farm together on their family farm. That is much more traditional than both parents working outside the home, or than one working outside the home and the other staying at home. Even in a big modern city like Los Angeles there are still some small family stores where the family lives above it or nearby, especially in Asian immigrant communities. Actually there is a doughnut shop fitting that description across the street from me. Now I want doughnuts. Thanks a lot!

Anhata's picture

A personal experience with the male caretaker

Submitted by Anhata on Tue, 11/29/2005 - 2:37am.

It's a little convoluted, but DH's mother's cousin's MIL gradually sunk into dementia over the years. Her son, the cousin's husband, let's call him "J", took care of her. His devotion was extraordinary. After eating dinner with his wife every night, he would go over to his mother's house to spend the night so that she would have help through the night if needed and in the morning. That way he knew she ate at least two meals, was clean, healthy, and safe. He bathed her, helped her potty, cooked, cleaned, and took care of her finances. My mind boggles at the level of care she got from her son until she finally became too disoriented to live at home anymore and went into a nursing home. For years this man took care of his mother, selflessly, and was wholly supported by his wife.

It's not a man/woman is less/more capable issue. It depends on the temperment, values, and dedication of the individual. I don't know many people who could care for their mothers the way J did, be they man or woman.

Which is the essential point of Lynn's I think. It fall down to who is tempermentally, mentally, and physically suited to what task, be they male or female.

Anhata
www.familynaturally.com
Your Family's General Store, Naturally

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options