Martha Found Guilty

Submitted by Lynn on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 1:00pm.

Martha Stewart found guilty: A New York jury has just returned guilty verdicts all four charges in a stock trading deal prosecutors said used insider information. I have to say, I thought the government's case was pretty weak and I'm surprised.

Technorati Tags:
( categories: )

Susannah's picture

Probably Making an Example

Submitted by Susannah on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 1:14pm.

I haven't been following the case in detail, though. Didn't the judge throw out the most serious charge?

silverbear's picture

Yes

Submitted by silverbear on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 2:15pm.

The judge threw out the charge of securities fraud. When this scandal broke, Martha told the public (and thus her shareholders), "I am innocent". Somehow the federal prosecutors twisted that to mean, she was lying to her shareholders in order to protect the value of her stock. The judge did not agree.
If I lived in the NYC area, I'd join Martha's gracious supporters wearing the "If the stock sale was legit, you must acquit" aprons.

Lynn's picture

I totally want that apron

Submitted by Lynn on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 3:28pm.

Wowie, I may have to print a transfer and make one...

Lynn Siprelle, Editor

kittycat45's picture

Lynn

Submitted by kittycat45 on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 4:28pm.

go to savemartha.com

they have t-shirts and hats etc...

silverbear's picture

another apron idea ...

Submitted by silverbear on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 5:18pm.

No justice, no peas!!!

Shaun's picture

Bumms me out

Submitted by Shaun on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 1:23pm.

I don't have a strong attachment to this case, but I felt like Martha was being made an example of in a bad sense. I think she was persecuted as a successful woman -- I really do. All the corporate crap going on -- even pre-Enron -- and Martha is prosecuted for dumping a stock that was going down. What did she save? Something like $40,000? Even $400,000 wouldn't be worth the risk for her.

People love to hate her, but I think she played a big role in making people appreciate the domestic arts. The trickle-down effect of her influence is huge. (Not that that makes her innocent, of course.)

Ah well.

silverbear's picture

shocked

Submitted by silverbear on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 1:36pm.

I'm stunned, actually. Even the talking heads on Fox News were saying that the gov't had nothing on this one.
She wasn't charged for the insider trading, but for "lying" and "conspiracy" to cover up the insider trading (for which there was not sufficient evidence to lay charges).
This is like a bad Kafka flick.
Rose

kittycat45's picture

very distressed

Submitted by kittycat45 on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 1:46pm.

I can't believe the verdict. She is appealing though.

you can go to her web site marthatalks.com

also savemartha.com

I am very upset that she is found guilty yet the execs for many companies that stole money from their employes are free.

read her lawyers closing statement...the goverment did not have a leg to stand on. Sounds like the jury had it out for her even before the trial.

its a very sad day for me Sad

Kitty Mc's picture

Kind of sad, isn't it? Esp

Submitted by Kitty Mc on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 2:24pm.

Kind of sad, isn't it?

Especially when you know that many people involved in a certain energy industry who did far worse as far as 'insider trading' and things like that go not only won't do jail time--but will probably earn nice paychecks as governmental advisers.

-Kitty, mama to Fiona, Thomas, and Dylan.

Anhata's picture

She could loose everything.

Submitted by Anhata on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 3:37pm.

I think Martha is getting caught up in a backlash that was none of her doing. People are so angry at insider trading, Enron, and the other financial scandals and they're taking it out on the high profile case.

What shocks me is "the government may press to have her removed from the board of her company". And that "Marketing experts have said that the company is so closely tied to her name and face that the effect could be devastating." She could loose everything.

I hope her lawyers get her off on an appeal. What she did was not bad enough to warrant her loosing everything she's worked for for the past two or three decades. She didn't do any insider trading. The sad thing is, she only saved around $51,000 dollars from the sale of her stock, a loss she should have easily absorbed, being worth millions. I think she's caught up in a nightmare.

______

May The Hair On Your Toes Never Fall Out

--Traditional Hobbit Blessing

mindymonster's picture

This sucks!

Submitted by mindymonster on Fri, 03/05/2004 - 4:56pm.

I've haven't been following this closely, but it seemed to me that the whole thing is bull. I can't believe that OJ Simpson can walk, but Martha Stuart gets a guilty sentence. I agree that they are taking the whole enron scandle out on her.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options