It would be difficult to write a paper commentary on a religion that has so many details. However, it helps to not quote people (and it said this in the article, der) who say that "although her parents are active in the LDS religion she considers the religion to be a cult, so has now chosen another religion." Considering there are so many people they could have asked, they picked one who left the religion in a huff. Weird. Anyhow, as I look at that particular article, I realize the whole paper is sort of slanted toward the "bible belt" which makes sense. The papers that are more "both sided" (is that possible?) seem to be doing a pretty good job. But still, it's frustrating when people will take a newspaper's word over an actual practicer of that religion.

Oh, and let me just say that I have nothing against the other religions, and that the term "Bible Belt" was not in any way supposed to be derogatory!