At least until I see more testing, and some proof that the vaccine isn't going to cause something as bad or worse than cancer in recipients down the road. If my child (God forbid) were to have a terminal disease and there was an experimental drug that MAY cure it or give them more quality hours here, I would *consider* it. But, if it were an experimental drug that should prevent my child from getting something, I would not do it. For me personally, this is much the same. And I find it both disturbing and not-so-concidental that the drug manufacturer is the main source of pushing for this. A little self-serving? Probably.

I am in Alabama and just today I read a small article that indicated that it was not required in our state and probably would not be. Is Texas the only state so far where it is required? That may be in an earlier post; sorry, I couldn't remember.

Just my $.02 on my personal views.

Vonnie

Clairee: The only thing that separates us from the animals is our ability to accessorize.

"Steel Magnolias"