![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||
Reply |
greetingGood Evening! Please get a free account or log in to comment or blog.
Here's what this site is about, and I encourage you to subscribe to one or more of the RSS feeds and subscribe to the newsletter using the form below. Thanks for visiting! --Lynn
|
Requirement
I very much want my daughter (who is 14 and not yet sexually active) to start her round of these vaccines. Since they take 6 months to finish, and she has Bipolar Disorder Type I, I do worry about her making a bad choice on impulse, although she is not planning to have sex anytime soon. (Whew!)
I'm of mixed minds about requiring it, though. I'm on Medicaid. Does it need to be a requirement for her to get it for free? Or can she get it because I want her to? Her ex-physician said we'd have to order it; he feels our rural/conservative area won't have enough interest to keep it around. Knowing how common HPV is, having it when I was only 25, and having part of my cervix removed (burnt off, actually) are reasons I want her to get it. They are also reasons I don't understand why parents __who aren't against vaccination in general__ don't want their daughters to have it.
HPV accounts for about 99% of cervical cancer. And though it usually isn't mentioned, this vaccine can protect males (and more females, since you sleep with everyone your partner has slept with), by reducing the rate at which women pass it on. Would so many people be against their sons getting it, I wonder? And how can information and shots (what fun those are) create a desire to go have sex? This is an argument I find ridiculous, especially when lack of info has been shown to increase activity and teen pregnancy.
Flu vaccine, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051221091232.htm : "In a commentary on the studies, Professor Paul Glezen of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston said: "During the period from 1989 to 1997 the vaccination rate for people aged over 65 in the US increased from 30 to 67 per cent. Despite this increase, mortality and hospitalisation rates continued to increase rather than decline as would be expected if the vaccine was optimally effective."
So the flu vaccine isn't doing so great--the article recommends vaccinating school kids, because they transmit it to more people.
Chicken pox vaccine, http://larchmontgazette.com/2006/teenhealth/20061026vaccinenew.html : Changing the recommendations for the vaccine, to add another, because it isn't working as well as expected. The goal is adding another for the 4-6 year range, since teens are getting chicken pox--another group which can easily transmit it to a large number of people.
Cervical cancer is CANCER. They finally came up with a way to lower a very common cancer rate. Who would deny their child a cancer vaccine? Would it make a difference if it were breast cancer, prostate cancer, or pancreatic cancer?
Parents keep their contagious kids home--we hope--and teach them to avoid sick people. Parents are the ones who convey information--we hope--and values about sexual activity. The chance of not getting cancer, giving someone an STD, and possibly decreasing their daughter's ability to carry a child to term.... Again, why say no?
HPV vaccine,