![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||
Reply |
greetingGood Morning! Please get a free account or log in to comment or blog.
Here's what this site is about, and I encourage you to subscribe to one or more of the RSS feeds and subscribe to the newsletter using the form below. Thanks for visiting! --Lynn
|
so corporate welfare is OK but welfare for poor folk isn't?
Here is a case made for why subsidies to huge agribusinesses are hurting taxpayers and damaging the economy: Archer Daniels Midland: A Case Study in Corporate Welfare. And it's published online here by the CATO Institue, no less. Da-aym.
[I should mention that the title of this post is my opinon, not relating to linked article above. CATO is against welfare to poor people AND to businesses, I am against subsidies, or welfare, given to for-profit companies, pork-barrel projects in other words. Unlike the CATO institute I do believe that people need a saftey net to keep out of desperate poverty.]
Anhata
www.familynaturally.com
Your Family's General Store, Naturally