![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||
Reply |
greetingGood Morning! Please get a free account or log in to comment or blog.
Here's what this site is about, and I encourage you to subscribe to one or more of the RSS feeds and subscribe to the newsletter using the form below. Thanks for visiting! --Lynn
|
Yes, he did have them and used them
With all due respect, I saw the photos and videos of the Kurds he massacred with chemical weapons, I didn't say that he never had them, I'm saying that our government had no legitimate intellegence that he was actively creating Weapons of Mass Destruction with intent to use them on the Israelis or anyone else the way they said they did.
You are correct, though, he did offer terrorist organizations safe haven and probably logistical and other support. I should have been more clear--there is no evidence linking him in any material way to 9/11. Although, I bet he wishes he had helped. Let there be no misunderstanding, I know that he is a warped, sick, deviant soul and that the world is better off without him controlling Iraq. But we were lied to and are still being lied to the whole time about the hows and whys of going to war.
"On Friday, the London Daily Telegraph and the Washington Times published the identical article, quoting Ahmed Chalabi, admitting, in effect, that his Iraqi National Congress had funneled disinformation to the United States, to induce an American invasion and ouster of Saddam Hussein." Posted Feb. 22, 2004, at Executive Intellegence Review
The intellence they funneled to the CIA was made up. And the informants were paid with taxpayers' money. Our taxes paid for the misinformation that Bush's Cabal used to take us to war. Yes, he had and had used chemical weapons, but, the the whole Weapons of Mass Destruction hype was fiction.
"The Telegraph/Times article reviewed several examples of INC-provided disinformation, including the most famous case of the alleged Iraqi mobile biological weapons labs, which turned out to be mobile units producing hydrogen for weather balloons. The source of the later-discredited claims was a major in the Iraqi intelligence service, who had been made available by the INC. "U.S. officials at first found the information credible, and the defector passed a lie-detector test," the story noted. "But in later interviews it became apparent that he was stretching the truth and had been 'coached by the INC.' He failed a second polygraph test and in May 2002, intelligence agencies were warned that the information was unreliable. But analysts missed the warning, and the mobile laboratory story remained firmly established in the catalogue of alleged Iraqi violations until months after the overthrow of Saddam."
" Same site.